Guest ScirosDarkblade Posted March 23, 2004 Share Posted March 23, 2004 I don't know if a thread for this film is around, so I'll start one. I'm sure many of you have seen it, and think it's totally awesome (because it IS totally awesome). It was Christian Bale's breakthrough [i]action[/i] role, and is why I really wanted him to be Batman in the first place (so I was happy he was chosen). As much as it shares with Brave New World and Fahrenheit 451, it's the cool and well-filmed action scenes which set it apart from other current movies. Some of the best action scenes I can think of are from this film. Anyway, I think about 80% of who has seen this film thinks it rocks. I'm wondering who thought it was downright crappy, and why. Anyone who says it sucked better freaking cite Taye Diggs's acting as one of the reasons. Because it was atrocious, and it by far the worst part of the film. The "reverse betrayal" twist which actually made no sense at all should also be cited. If the above reasons are NOT cited, then whoever watched the movie obviously watches it without thinking, or without caring about film quality to begin with. Those people don't have to answer, because I don't like to talk to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now