Guest boogeta Posted November 17, 2002 Posted November 17, 2002 I was just thinking about this movie and it made me wonder did they rate the movie wrong because I think this should be an R rated movie instead of PG13:(
PiroMunkie Posted November 17, 2002 Posted November 17, 2002 [color=indigo]There was nothing of [b]R[/b] quality in that movie. The only questionable content [i]might[/i] be the fact that it deals with Satan and his children, but it was a comedy. It was not like they were constantly speaking blasphemy. Everything in there was used for a comedic purpose. Nothing offensive. So yes, it was rated right.[/color]
Guest boogeta Posted November 17, 2002 Posted November 17, 2002 I dony think so yes I know it was a comedy but I still think that should have been rated R
Transtic Nerve Posted November 17, 2002 Posted November 17, 2002 It was rated R for "Return immediately, this movie sucks"
Omar Harris Posted November 17, 2002 Posted November 17, 2002 Satan is used in even cartoons for comedic reasons, so the movie revolving around him would not be considered worthy of an R rating. The only thing I saw that was R material was the fact that one of the demons had breast on head, but they were usually in a bra so it wasn't pornographic. And like TN said, this movie sucked so bad.
Semjaza Posted November 17, 2002 Posted November 17, 2002 Suggestive imagry, such as Satanic ideas can actually get a movie an R rating if there is a decent amount of it with someother risky things lol. Spawn (if you liked it or not lol) went from R to PG-13 just by removing a graveyard scene with some stupid satanists in it. In this case it is kind of different, since Little Nicky doesn't take itself seriously at all and is a comedy. I thought this movie was horrible as well. Mr. Deeds looks even worse. I'm kind of interested in the cartoon Eight Crazy Nights though lol.
Guest boogeta Posted November 18, 2002 Posted November 18, 2002 I didnt like the movie but there were some good parts
Foredaddy Posted November 18, 2002 Posted November 18, 2002 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by boogeta [/i] [B]I dont think so yes I know it was a comedy but I still think that should have been rated R [/B][/QUOTE] But what is your reason?
Guest Riku Posted November 18, 2002 Posted November 18, 2002 why do you think it shoud be raded r its funny.::wigout:
vegeta rocker Posted November 19, 2002 Posted November 19, 2002 I think it is borderline pg13 i have always thought they should have something in between. And to Riku be careful, watch out or you might get your head chewed off by a mod. Don't double post.
Guest boogeta Posted November 19, 2002 Posted November 19, 2002 1) was the breasts on that one guys head that was more then enough but I have a couple other things. 2)was the cursing in it which was a lot 3)the gothic moments 4)sexual referances
vegeta rocker Posted November 20, 2002 Posted November 20, 2002 Perhaps a boob head steers it towards rated r. But that bird scared the hell outta me.
Foredaddy Posted November 20, 2002 Posted November 20, 2002 wow boobs! 13 year olds cant possibly take boobs! and on some guys head no less! Impossible! thats worse than sodomy! It should have an X rating! Run for the hills!! AAAA! as for the swearing, it is in lots of movies. I recall "James and the Giant Peach". The Grasshopper said "***". that word gave the movie a PG rating. (Dont know why i added that little bit but it sounded right at the time) America is a puss when it comes to this crap. Were raising a bunch of pansy children! We need to quit whining about a nipple being seen or the f-bomb being dropped. Man whats gonna happen when these kids get out into the real world where there are nipples and f-bombs all over the place!? Huh!?
Guest boogeta Posted November 20, 2002 Posted November 20, 2002 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Foredaddy [/i] [B]wow boobs! 13 year olds cant possibly take boobs! and on some guys head no less! Impossible! thats worse than sodomy! It should have an X rating! Run for the hills!! AAAA! as for the swearing, it is in lots of movies. I recall "James and the Giant Peach". The Grasshopper said "***". that word gave the movie a PG rating. (Dont know why i added that little bit but it sounded right at the time) America is a puss when it comes to this crap. Were raising a bunch of pansy children! We need to quit whining about a nipple being seen or the f-bomb being dropped. Man whats gonna happen when these kids get out into the real world where there are nipples and f-bombs all over the place!? Huh!? [/B][/QUOTE] You do have a point and have came to a conclusion I think it was rated right
vegeta rocker Posted November 22, 2002 Posted November 22, 2002 James and the giant peach was traumatizing as well. As for little Nicky, Sandlers movies just seem to be getting worse and worse.
Guest boogeta Posted November 30, 2002 Posted November 30, 2002 Yay I know sandlers movies suck I lied that one with th penguines
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now