boris Posted November 20, 2001 Share Posted November 20, 2001 do you think there has been a large raise in game play time??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Break Posted November 20, 2001 Share Posted November 20, 2001 [SIZE=1]What do you mean... Do PS2 games have more gameplayability? Well I think they do... I don't have one but I have seen the games... and since they are bigger (maybe better) they have more gameplay time... Well... if that's what you mean...:confused:[/SIZE] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted November 20, 2001 Share Posted November 20, 2001 ps2 games are too short, they should be longer, but since sony is concentrating more on graphics I doubt we will see any long games, I fear even the final fantasy games will be shorter than expected.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoCactuar Posted November 21, 2001 Share Posted November 21, 2001 I heard that FFXI could be two double-sided PS2 discs. That?s pretty long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Break Posted November 21, 2001 Share Posted November 21, 2001 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by NeoCactuar [/i] [B]I heard that FFXI could be two double-sided PS2 discs. That?s pretty long. [/B][/QUOTE] [SIZE=1]Double sided?! Whoa... that's 4 discs then... And if you compare a PSX disc with a PS2 disc, the PS2 disc is three times more powerful... so that means that... that is equivalent to 12 PSX discs... I think.[/SIZE] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorykoAngelcry Posted November 21, 2001 Share Posted November 21, 2001 [COLOR=darkred][SIZE=1]I recently played Kessen 2 (basically Dynasty Warriors and Kessen rolled into 1 nice package) The graphics are very nice, and the spell effects are very awesome, but the overall length is very much lacking. It was really easy to beat, and I hope that it is because I picked up the gameplay right away, and not because it was THAT easy. I don't know if there are tons of secrets as in Dynasty Warriors, but if not, then this game is definitely not worth the time or the money to get. I am glad I rented it instead of buying it.[/SIZE][/COLOR] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shibatku Posted November 21, 2001 Share Posted November 21, 2001 I think that games atre way larger than last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoCactuar Posted November 22, 2001 Share Posted November 22, 2001 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by ShadowGohan [/i] [B] [SIZE=1]Double sided?! Whoa... that's 4 discs then... And if you compare a PSX disc with a PS2 disc, the PS2 disc is three times more powerful... so that means that... that is equivalent to 12 PSX discs... I think.[/SIZE] [/B][/QUOTE] Yeah, but remember, there are A LOT of graphics to put in, and i think one of them was for the online gaming system, but still. Hopefully it will be big. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zidargh Posted November 22, 2001 Share Posted November 22, 2001 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by ShadowGohan [/i] [B] [SIZE=1]Double sided?! Whoa... that's 4 discs then... And if you compare a PSX disc with a PS2 disc, the PS2 disc is three times more powerful... so that means that... that is equivalent to 12 PSX discs... I think.[/SIZE] [/B][/QUOTE] Final Fantasy IX is 4 discs. Shadow Gohan you're completely wrong there (Not critiscising (sp)) What Sephiroth said is very true SONY is concentrating more on graphics, which can be quite dissapointing with some of the games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoCactuar Posted November 22, 2001 Share Posted November 22, 2001 Were talking about Final Fantasy XI, Being 11. What are you doing bring IX, being 9, into this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fall Posted November 24, 2001 Share Posted November 24, 2001 This topic is on a large raise on gameplay, not FF9. There is another forum for that, so go there. I'll just post on the topic............... There has been a quite large raise in gameplay for 2001. It has raised by 25% in Australia, 47% in the US, and a whopping 79% for the UK! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zidargh Posted November 24, 2001 Share Posted November 24, 2001 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by NeoCactuar [/i] [B]Were talking about Final Fantasy XI, Being 11. What are you doing bring IX, being 9, into this? [/B][/QUOTE] Sorry, I read the numerals wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoCactuar Posted November 24, 2001 Share Posted November 24, 2001 That's cool. It's easy to get mixed up :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothNIN Posted November 25, 2001 Share Posted November 25, 2001 what are you people talking about, gameplay doesn't change as time passes, it all depends on the type of game. FF3 for the SNES was just as long as 7 or 8...9 was a little longer, hell Xenogears was 1 disc and was longer than...pretty much everything. Metal Gear Solid 1 is probably the same length as 2, since they need a lot of time and effort to make it. Does anyone really want to play a metal gear solid that lasts 40 hours? (and do u want to wait 10 years for them to make it?). When a series comes out on the same system (kessen and kessen 2, FF7 and FF8, um...banjo kazooie and it's dumb sequel), of course they're going to add a few more levels, make it slightly longer, and duh 32-bit games are going to be longer than NES or game gear ones. Also what do u mean disc "power"? If you mean memory than it's not exactly 12x, a PSX CD can have 650mb, and a PS2 DVD can have...ah...up to 6GB I think it is, not exactly sure, either way, disc length doesn't matter either. The x-files 5 disc game (saw my cousin play, heh) took maybe an hour because of it being mostly real footage (gah I forgot the technical word...used it a lot for many crappy Sega CD games....damn I can't remember ><)....oh full motion video, heh yay ok anyway...ah... yeah I like games long, but I'd rather they leave it as is instead of inserting pointless quests or added blah-ness just to make it one hour longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cyclone Posted November 26, 2001 Share Posted November 26, 2001 Well here's a few games that were way too short but were good. -Onimusha -ZOE -Devil May Cry -Klonoa 2 -Star Wars: Starfighter There's mopre but that's what I can come up with off the top of my head. So to make it shorter I think that games are getting shorter this year rather than longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoCactuar Posted November 26, 2001 Share Posted November 26, 2001 I agree, Z.O.E was WAY to short, i hired it out for one day and clocked it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boris Posted November 27, 2001 Author Share Posted November 27, 2001 yeah , i own a lot of games, and i think graphics are a lot better, but game play is down. i can now beat games in a matter of days. when it would take my weeks on older games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now