-
Posts
925 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Harry
-
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by ZxFrOgGie13 [/i] [B][font=arial][size=1]Well I know guys who play girls are dogs, and dogs are no good. [/font][/size] [/B][/QUOTE] Girls wouldn't be played if they didn't think every single relationship was the big one. Sorry, just felt like saying that. And just leave the guy to figure it out himself, he obviously doesn't care about you if he didn't have the decency to dump you then go out with another girl.
-
Liberals or Conservatives: Who is the bigger threat?
Harry replied to Harry's topic in General Discussion
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by BabyGirl [/i] [B][color=deeppink]I don't know if this is off-topic or not, but today I took some photographs of people rallying [i]for[/i] the war. It was the first organized group of people supporting our troops that I have seen thus far. There were only about 6 of them, but they were standing on a corner of a busy, busy intersection, and the entire time that I was taking pictures, the horns of drivers-by never stopped going. I think more people support the war than we know, there are just some people who are afraid of the criticism that they will recieve if they speak out about it. I chatted with the lady in charge of the group and told her that I appreciated what they were all doing. I'm still on the fence about whether or not the war is a "good" thing, but I loved seeing people doing something other than creating a second Veitnam-esque peace protest. I don't know if some people who protest the war really don't want one to happen, or if they just do it because it's the popular thing to do. I guess it was just a refreshing thing to see friendly, patriotic people out in the community letting their out numbered opinions be heard. So yes, I don't know if that was off topic, but it made my day.[/color] [/B][/QUOTE] There was a big rally supporting the war in Houston just yesterday. People that are for the war don't need to speak about it because the government supports their ideas, the hippies that don't like the war don't have the support so they have to make their position known. -
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Nim [/i] [B] Anyway my dad promised me that he would tell me before he got rid of her but he didnt, GOD WHAT A PAIN IN THE ***! I really am stuck! what should i do! HELP!:flaming: :devil: :wigout: :naughty: [/B][/QUOTE] What does it matter? You abandoned him. Choose one of them and stick with her/him. Jumping inbetween will only make things worse. [quote]But still its your choice and your dad shouldn't be mad.[/quote] It's her choice so she has to live with the consequences (read: getting her dad mad).
-
Liberals or Conservatives: Who is the bigger threat?
Harry replied to Harry's topic in General Discussion
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Orien_Xel [/i] [B][color=blue]I'd just like to clarify that I do not support Saddam. I just want peace. You people want a war that will kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. I do not. That is all.[/color] [/B][/QUOTE] So you'd rather have his oppressive regime to stay in power striking fear into all his people and neighboring countries? -
My girlfriend was considered legally a midget when she turned 18 (i think it's like 4'11) and now she's around 5'4
-
A Penguin. Penguins kick *** and so do I.
-
Liberals or Conservatives: Who is the bigger threat?
Harry replied to Harry's topic in General Discussion
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by {SITH} Change [/i] [B] If you belive is conservatism, you are afraid of change, you wish to hold back society from the brink of rapid progress and slow things down. If you are a liberal, you look ahead and take the plunge, you go for the gold. [/B][/QUOTE] If you're a conservative you don't hold back society, you just don't want it to change rapidly. Liberals want things to change radically and instantly which just never happens. -
Liberals or Conservatives: Who is the bigger threat?
Harry replied to Harry's topic in General Discussion
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by gokents [/i] [B]This thread is based on a bankrupt subject that has no debate value. [/B][/QUOTE] You're destroying my well thought out thread by your wannabe modism. -
Liberals or Conservatives: Who is the bigger threat?
Harry replied to Harry's topic in General Discussion
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Braidless Baka [/i] [B] And last I heard, nuclear war was the big terrorism thing, or maybe I'm worng, but my comment can work for either situation... [/B][/QUOTE] Your comment doens't work in either situation. You're confusing nuclear war with a nuclear bomb blowing up a city. Also if you didn't notice, this thread was mainly about America, I did not mention other countries because this one is specifically about America. -
Liberals or Conservatives: Who is the bigger threat?
Harry replied to Harry's topic in General Discussion
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by BabyGirl [/i] [B][color=deeppink] I was referring to the people who are a mix of both, [/color] [/B][/QUOTE] Yes but most tend to vote more for conservatives and liberals. It's almost impossible to be a full fledged liberal with no conservative tendencies and vice versa. -
Liberals or Conservatives: Who is the bigger threat?
Harry replied to Harry's topic in General Discussion
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Braidless Baka [/i] [B] And I believe you're very niave if you think it's [i]only[/i] america that's going to suffer if there's nuclear war. [/B][/QUOTE] I was talking about Terrorism friend. [quote]the one who started a thread about canabalism buddy... [/quote] And what exactly is barbaric about asking a person if they would resort to cannibalism in a life or death situation? It doesn't take me a whole day to think up a single question. [quote]Like BabyGirl said, a good majority of the U.S. seem to be a mix of both. [/quote] those that sit in the middle, unable to choose a side, are the big threats. eventually, they choose the most popular side, only serving to dummy up that side's argument. -
Liberals or Conservatives: Who is the bigger threat?
Harry replied to Harry's topic in General Discussion
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by SpyderDragon [/i] [B]You sure like to be contrivertial (spl?) don't you? [/B][/QUOTE] I accidently left that in, that's for pointing it out. -
Consider this. In these times of terrorism-affected living in the greatest country in the world (America), the blame is constantly being shifted between the two opposing political alignments: Liberalism and Conservative. Both sides are undeniably guilty. Conservatives, motivated by a primal id and neo-colonial need to imperialize all of the world under the scepter of capitalism, continue to push for aggressive actiosn towards the East. Seeking little more than another tallied conquest upon the GOP's walls, and cheaper oil to power SUVs driven by materialistic yuppies, the conservatives will stop at nothing short of a nuclear holocaust to ensure complete subjugation of Iraq, and conversion to the conservative dual-headed god: Jesus and Capitalism. This insane and unsympathetic aggression operates entirely without any consideration of possible consequences, namely retaliation from the Arab world. Which brings us to our second case: The liberals. Psuedo-treehuggers and peace loving hippies, the liberals empathize so heavily with minorities, that we can not apply a rationally justified policy of ethnic profiling of arabs with beckoning the howls of the left. True, such a policy is against the principles expressed by the Bill of Rights, but times have changed, and the threat of unchecked biological or nuclear devestation waits carefully in the shadows to strike at the very heart of Americans everywhere. To make matters worse, the liberals will not cease their anti-individualist crusade against the right to bear arms. Even if terrorists could sneak into targetted areas with their weapons, most americans would not be able to take a chance and strike them down in an act of courageous self-defense and defense of the country, merely because the liberals believe that they have found the solution to all of Americas crime problems. And who can forget the liberal love of the Jews, which has bound America to Israel's hand in marrige, further compounding our problems? So, I ask you, who is the greater threat here?
-
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Blanko [/i] [B] If they kept her alive with that machine just long enough to actualy get things stright. get a second opinion and MAYBE even new organs... she could have lived. and not on a machine for the rest of her life like your grandfather. Im talking get better stand up and walk around. [/B][/QUOTE] Her recovering was not likely at all, even if her brain wasn't damage.
-
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Lady Macaiodh [/i] [B][color=darkblue]I've always got a big kick out of those stupid old ones with godzilla & stuff. They were just soooo terrible.... & yet good.[/color] [/B][/QUOTE] There was a Godzilla marathon a couple of months ago, it was good fun.
-
Marines definately, army are just drones they use to send in and they don't care if you live or die, marines you can go somewhere.
-
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Heaven's Cloud [/i] [B][color=indigo]Come on Sara, what do you think he meant when he sang to children "oh please won't you be my neighbor" with those come hither eyes. Do you think a grown man keeps a toy train and a bunch of puppets in his living room unless he wants to seduce young children? It really wouldn't suprise me if old Freddy boy was a member of NAMBLA[/color] [/B][/QUOTE] Viagra wasn't around back then (atleast when I watched it) so I doubt it.
-
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Yu Law [/i] [B]Hey you have to realize.One of the two h disses canome back next year and be.........GORGEOUS!!!Thus making him cry everynight cause he chose the wrong one LOL[/B][/QUOTE] I said go for both. If one comes back Gorgeous, more power to him.
-
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by gokents [/i] [B]I thought you left because your damn sister died.:therock:[/B][/QUOTE] If you didn't notice, I joined in October of 2001, and then came back less than a month ago.
-
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Lalaith Ril [/i] [B] We have so many threads now of more mature topics ranging from pregnancy, suicide, or even homosexuality. Instead of the old stuff, such as snowboarding and such. [/B][/QUOTE] When I came here (October 2001) all there was were suicide threads and how depressed everyone was, that's why I left.
-
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Lalaith Ril [/i] [B]Also Harry, that was spam you realize that? Just telling ya man. Try and edit it with atleast something you think about this thread O.o [/B][/QUOTE] I did, that story was a lie and that's what I think Arikel's is too.
-
An orange blew up and now I don't have a left arm.
-
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Blanko [/i] [B] If they kept her alive through the machines for just long enough to get a second opinion they by chance could have acutaly saved her life. Then she would not have NEEDED the machines. The fact still remains that the hospital was told wo wait. And they did not. The family has every right to sue for all that the hospitals worth... or at least that doctor.[/B][/QUOTE] My grandfather this year was put on a machine to keep him alive. Have you ever seen someone that's hooked up to a respirator? It's not a pretty thing and they sure as hell don't look alive. Also, it would have to be pretty bad for them to even think the girl is braindead, let alone if it's true. My point is there was no reason to keep that girl alive.
-
[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Lady Macaiodh [/i] [B][COLOR=darkblue] What kind of an excuse is that?[/COLOR] [/B][/QUOTE] A lot if the organ donation place mislabeled the organ. Also, I'm not very aware of the % of success for simultaneous heart and lung transplants but I doubt it's extremely high. [quote]And the fact that they pulled the plug after the family said to wait says to me that they're covering up something. [/quote] The girl was braindead, if the family wanted to keep her alive through some stupid machine then they're morons.